Talk:Citizen Force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Citizen Force page.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Military history: British / European

This disambiguation page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Untitled[edit]

This article, and the one on the Permanent Force, is incorrect in one resepcet - conscripts were part of the Citizen Force, not the Permanent Force. The Permanent Force was composed of those who volunteered to join the military, either temporarily or as a career.

Conscription involved an initial fixed period, followed by "camps", i.e. short periods usually spent within a commando. Both types of service were within the Citizen Force. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.240.127.230 (talk) 22:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig page?[edit]

G'day, given that there is limited content on this page, I wonder if perhaps it should just be converted into a disambiguation page? The relevant information relating to each country's version of the CF could then fully be discussed at whatever article the dab page would point to. Does anyone have any concerns about this approach? Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 21:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have done this now. If there are any concerns, please let me know. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]