Talk:Claro Abánades López

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original research[edit]

This fragment seems OR (and wrong) to me:

"One of them was Círculos Culturales Vázquez de Mella,[111] soon formatted by the socialist youth as means of disseminating their vision.[112] Not yet ready for open challenge, they invited older Carlists as front-men, supposed to provide them with Traditionalist credentials.[113] Abánades was probably not aware of the plot when elected president of Junta Nacional de los Círculos Vázquez de Mella in 1959,[114] later becoming the honorary president.[115]"

Could you please specify where exatly (what page) does the source say that? It's hard to believe that "Círculos Culturales Vázquez de Mella" were some sort of "plot" to make reactionary Carlism turn into a leftist strange thing. Both Mercedes Vázquez de Prada and Ramón M. Rodón Guinjoan make it very clear that Carlos Hugo's camarilla was NOT in charge of the Carlist movement (Comunión Tradicionalista) before 1965, so what you write here must be wrong.--Raderich (talk) 23:05, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

There are five entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
LINKFARM states: {{tq|There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. -- Otr500 (talk) 13:17, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]