Talk:Classical architecture

Architecture Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive[edit]

Architecture of Africa is currently nominated on Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. Come to this page and support it with your vote. Help us improve this article to featured status.--Fenice 08:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

General state of article[edit]

This article is pretty rubbish. A few random points about ethnic identity and not very much about classical architecture! It doesn't even mention that the ancient Greeks didn't use the arch, whereas the ancient Romans did. I hope no one minds if I give it a bit of a re-write. Yaris678 (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping you would be an expert on the subject, it certainly needs work. I believe the Greek and Roman architecture is 'classical antiquity', and classical architecture is what developed from that, from the Renaissance onward. More research or an expert needed though. ProfDEH (talk) 13:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... certainly the Greeks and Romans wouldn't have used the term classical, unless perhaps they were wishing to distinguish one building from another. The modern use of classical architecture starts in the renaissance and is down to Andrea Palladio who studied ancient Greek and Roman architecture and applied the principles to his own buildings. I think Palladio is an example of classicism, but it makes sense to refer to the original as classical, in the same way as classical mythology or, indeed, classical order. Yaris678 (talk) 13:52, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A prerequisite for editing this article might be John Summerson, The Classical Language of Architecture, 1963, often reprinted and still available in paperback.--Wetman (talk) 17:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A good book! We should definitely cite it in our article. It can be accessed through google books

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=57aoJE26kQkC&pg=PA7

A more recent book, with more pictures, is also available

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WfMknLxaJCwC&pg=PP1

Removed a sentence from the intro - many of the most famous buildings are palazzos / stately homes, not public at all. ProfDEH (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Petrifaction[edit]

Moved a bit of content from the article Petrifaction to here as it was about architecture style rather than fossilization. Have fun with it. Vsmith (talk) 04:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Petrification[edit]

I suggest that this section be moved to its own page instead. Any thoughts? Yakikaki (talk) 08:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moorish and others[edit]

How come Moorish Architecture ( and Moorish Revival ) is not added in the info box down at the bottom of the article? I also notice the absense of Post Modern Architecture.

Ungrateful and Diminishing article[edit]

One would not expect anything better from an Anglo-Saxon redneck ideology driven illiterate encyclopaedic web-page, as Wikipedia such as it is. Shortage of historians or architects in the English world to write a decent classical architecture article when not even a Greek temple is shown, but only the American redneck copies of it? The usual allergy that sends shivers inside the so-called "western" redeck neobarbarians when they have to refer to Greek or Roman History. On the other hand I do remember the half-page also diminishing article on Magna Graecia trying to squeeze a millenium of Greek colonial history with scientints, philosophers, poets, many surviving Greek temples into a half a page of a wikipedia article. But as usually the rednecks favor and honour the eastern illiterate nomads of Petra with a multi-page article. And the article on Theater, with no mention on the Greek origins of the subject but rather an English flavor to it from the usual neobarbaric idiots. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ate Nike (talk • contribs) 13:58, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ARH 371_The TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural Representations[edit]

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2024 and 2 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ndballar (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ndballar (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]