Talk:Clayton-le-Moors

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Clayton Hall[edit]

Some info or a page on Clayton Hall and the family would be good, here is a link to some info... Clayton Hall Bankhallbretherton (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clayton-le-Moors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mural[edit]

I have reworded, attempting to repeat my deletion of an editorialised lament for a mural which doesn't exist. The simple deletion of a pointless sentence was reverted by an anonymous user without explanation.

More information is needed to explain what it was, where it was, when or why it was demolished and by whom. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Humphrey Tribble I agree that content should be removed. It was added to a completely unreferenced version of this article all the way back in 2006 [1]. I've previously been involved in a related issue with the Leeds and Liverpool Canal article. It does need more work however, as there is a marker for the half-way point, just it is about a mile down the canal in neighbouring, Church. I've not been able to find any evidence of a mural, and it doesn't appear significant anyway. But it seems Clayton may have at some point been half-way and some modification to the canal has changed that. p4 This article generally could use improvement. I'd help if you are interested? TiB chat 19:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]