Talk:Clifton Bridge railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Clifton Bridge railway station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very well-written. Only a few comments:

  • Please add the note on the "chains" unit at the end of the line where the unit is first mentioned.
    It already is. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • from Clanage Road / Rownham Hill What does the slash mean?
    The road is named both Clanage Road and Rownham Hill. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • 4 ft 8 1⁄2 in (1,435 mm) standard gauge Can "standard gauge" be linked?
    Done. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Both platforms had "half barrel" canopies added What is "half barrel"?
    It's a term for that sort of canopy, it means it has a semicircular profile. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • other signal boxes at Oakwood, Pill and Portishead No need to link Portishead here again.
    Done. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • In "Future", it may be good to mention in the opening lines that reopening is due in 2019. It is mentioned at the end as of now.
    Done. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These addressed, I would be pleased to promote this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the replies. This article is indeed a great job, enjoyed reading it. I believe this article is ready for GA status. Happy to promote this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 07:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clifton Bridge railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clifton Bridge railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]