Talk:Clinical engineering

Technical-terminology dense

I'm no Clinical Engineer. Reading through the article, it's hard to understand what is written, especially in the first paragraphs. I don't feel qualified to summarize this jargon accurately, but I would love to see someone else do so. Thanks friends <3 PocketsForBirds (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

I

I have moved this article from Clinical Engineering to clinical engineering because I think these kinds of articles shouldn't be capitalized, see for example software engineering and genetic engineering. Fetofs ^Hello! 13:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I think this section (clinical engineering, CE) really needs some meat. The article states that this career is sometimes seen as the equivalent of biomedical equipment technologist (BMET), which is currently a very robust section in Wikipedia. However, CE in this section has very little explaining what the field really does and is responsible for. If the author(s) feel that the terms CE and BMET are indeed equivalent, perhaps bringing them together into one section is a solution that may work. Discovery Diver (talk) 00:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

CEs do work in similar settings as BMETs, but their roles are typically quite different...with the former being recognized by the major relevant professional organizations as an established branch of Biomedical Engineering. Technicians do perform valuable work and I would not comment on whose is more or less "important," but it is nonetheless distinguished from that of engineers. Of course, as with many branches of engineering, sometimes in practice they can spend portions of their time doing "technician" type work, and conversely, sometimes technicians contribute to design or analysis in ways that could be deemed engineering. Biolawyer (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Clinical engineering. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070710164058/http://www.aami.org/certification/cce.1299.mins.html to http://www.aami.org/certification/cce.1299.mins.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070908184519/http://www.bmes.org/careers.asp to http://www.bmes.org/careers.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129034052/http://www.accenet.org/downloads/cecertification/CCE%20Handbook%202014.pdf to http://www.accenet.org/downloads/cecertification/CCE%20Handbook%202014.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090310113903/http://www.bmes.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=71344&orgId=bes to http://www.bmes.org/mc/page.do?sitePageId=71344&orgId=bes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)