Talk:Clion

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Valid entry CLion[edit]

(following on from discussion at Talk:JetBrains)...
User:Walter Görlitz An entry for CLion was valid either way:

With a redlink while there was a redlink in the article per MOS:DABRL (a redlink was used in another article, so shoring up the target with a redlink to enable a redlink here was prudent)
- Without the redlink in the article per WP:DABMENTION

This removal [1] has two issues:

It removed a valid entry
- The edit summary "redlink" doesn't cover why - redlinks are allowed in dab pages per above, and even without the redlink it's a valid entry per above. Edit warring removing a valid/desirable redlink at the target and then removing the entry here isn't helpful to readers or correct per DABMENTION.
It left the dab with all geo items, so if leaving like that, should have restored the {{geodis}}.

Moving on, I created a redirect with possibilities, as the item has demonstrably at least two RS. Widefox; talk 08:49, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Nominating for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:08, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks are valid, redirects are also valid (both given the correct qualifiers). It's a valid entry, and a valid redirect. Competing products are notable, so there's nothing unusual (although the product seems a bit early). Widefox; talk 18:28, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]