Talk:Closed on Sunday/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 02:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Because of your numerous amazing reviews of my articles, I will take this on. At first glance it looks good. LOVI33 02:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

LOVI33 Thanks a lot, cannot wait to see your comments. --K. Peake 08:43, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Are you sure Gospel should be included as a genre since it specifically refers to it's chorus?

• Shouldn't it be fine to include as a genre since not only is the chorus included more than once but it is not described as merely "influence" from, or "elements" of gospel? --K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

• "songwriting credit was added" → "a songwriting credit was added"

•  Done --K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

• For the release sentence, add something about it being released through GOOD Music and Def Jam Recordings.

•  Done does that look fine? --K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Background and development

• "McDonald's" → "McDonald's", with target.

•  Done --K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Composition and lyrics

• Looks Good!

Release and promotion

• Looks Good!

Critical reception

• Looks Good!

Music video

• "An accompanying music video was directed" → "An accompanying music video for "Closed on Sunday" was directed"

•  Not done since I thought this too, until I learnt otherwise on Talk:Follow God/GA1. --K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

• Shouldn't he be mentioned as "West" instead of "Kanye"?

• See MOS:SAMESURNAME, or is this not following that MOS rule properly and should it be "Kanye West" instead? --K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Commercial performance

• Looks Good!

In popular culture

• Looks Good!

Credits and personnel

• Looks Good!

Charts

• Looks Good!

Notes

• Looks Good!

References

• Copyvio score looks good at 27.0%
• There are a few unarchived citations, but the rest look good.

External links

• Looks Good!

Final comments and verdict

• As always, the article is really well written. I'm going to put it  On hold for now. Just a few small fixes, shouldn't take too long. LOVI33 15:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

• LOVI33 Thanks for the review and proper feedback, have made some comments to you regarding it though. --K. Peake 15:51, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

• Kyle Peake, you had good reasons for not applying some of my suggestions so I'm going to ✓ Pass it. Great Job! LOVI33 16:10, 4 August 2020 (UTC)