Talk:CoaXPress

This article was nominated for deletion on January 27 2010. The result of the discussion was delete.

proposed article changes[edit]

external link 4 in the article: http://info.adimec.com/blogposts/bid/93362/The-Future-of-Machine-Vision-Continued-the-Future-Standards-Forum has no title, so the title should be updated.

external link 6 in the article is pure advertisement and wrong content behind the link. There are at least 4 CXP core vendors today as: http://www.s2i.org, http://www.kayainstruments.com, http://dcreation.jp and http://www.mrcy.com where the only with a official CXP certification is the one from s2i.org, which can be seen here: http://jiia.org/en/cxp/ -> http://jiia.org/en/cxp/camera005/ and which runs up to 4 lane CXP6 as a DEVICE as HOST core.

Can this be updated soon? --Wfeith (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because... (I am using CoaXPress standard ,this article is in editting) --Stawman (talk) 02:01, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see zero references / sources outside of the two entities that are promoting this. In Wikipedia terms, lack of substantive coverage in secondary sources is an indication that it does not meet wp:notability, a requirement for existence of a separate article. North8000 (talk) 14:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I found one and put it in. North8000 (talk) 15:24, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I actually thought of AFD'ing this myself a few weeks ago but now think that it is a standard that needs to be covered somewhere. Possibly the result (from a discussion here or regular AFD) could be to move it to a section in another article, but speedying it would somewhat kill that possibility. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 15:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that it should be a separate article. North8000 (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

It seems that this page keeps being deleted because it was deleted in the past. The CoaXPress page has references from 6 different sources and addition have been made by 5 different people, with different backgrounds.

This standard is being used in the machine vision and industrial camera market. People who are not familiar with this market may never have heard about CoaXPress, but within this market it has become a relevant standard being used by many companies. I quickly googled "CoaXPress" and I already found more than 20 companies that have products based on this standard.

I am one of engineers who was (and still is) involved in the development of the CoaXPress standard. I will update this page, but I will do my best to be neutral about this topic.

--Bdevuyst (talk) 21:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't mind and are up for the work to improve it, I'll go into a sort of "tough love" mode on this to try to get the article improved.......I know the general field, but the not the specific standard. I think that this topic needs to be covered, and probably as a separate article. North8000 (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you are much more experienced in writing wikipedia articles than me, so I appreciate your help. --Bdevuyst (talk) 23:20, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on CoaXPress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:25, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]