Talk:Coco Fusco

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

ArtAndFeminism

This article was created or improved at Art+Feminism edit-a-thons in 2015, 2016 and 2017.ArtAndFeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArtAndFeminism articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Ppers 7.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:55, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

This article is full of unreferenced assertions such as "The performance is meant to make us question how much is too much information, and whether the increase in technological development in contemporary society is a good thing or a bad thing." Ty 15:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted. She is a noteworthy artist with numerous works. If you absolutely must, do not delete, but instead remove the details to Select Performances and Collaborative Works section.—Preceding unsigned comment added by JNG (talk • contribs) 23 April, 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.90.218.115 (talk)

While I make no assumptions about her work, mere productivity does not create notability. If she is notable, where is the properly cited evidence from reliable sources? --Orange Mike | Talk 21:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have not the time to edit the article, but a quick Google search of her name will verify her importance - conversations at MoMA, inclusion in the most recent Whitney Biennial, and a number of important books she has written or edited. As an art historian and curator, I can assure you that this article is worth keeping on Wikipedia, with revisions for content. I would advise that the article be edited, but certainly not deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adgyorody (talk • contribs) 19:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article relies too heavily upon the information provided from Coco Fusco's own artist website, and that of Grey Associates, to be considered neutral [[[User:Ppers 7|Ppers 7]] (talk) 00:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC)][reply]

I've added information about the artist's body of work, with a significant number of proper references, and removed the unreferenced/non-neutral descriptions of performance pieces. I think this should resolve the majority of the neutrality and notability issues. Catemcc (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned Comments from IP user / SPA in January 2016[edit]

This article is still full of unreferenced assertions and should be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:8103:EF00:9D18:DDAB:A050:400A (talk) 16:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Switching template[edit]

Hi all, I think the key thing that this article needs is citations. The problem isn't factual accuracy, it is citations. As someone with subject area expertise, I can assure you that Coco Fusco meets notability requirements. I would strongly discourage you from pursuing the notability question here. But I agree: needs citations. I would like to switch the template from accuracy to citations. I will do so if I don't hear any objections. --Theredproject (talk) 18:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, I added factual information, corrected broken links, updated page to current day, and added citations and quotes from the artist. As an expert in this subject area, I must assure everyone that this artist/writer/curator is ver4y well-respected and influential in our field and should not be deleted. Certainly more can be done and I will continue to try and make improvements. --Ajenik (talk) 23:17, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello all, based on the citations that were added to this article, I have removed the "factual accuracy" warning from the page. --Mesquitetree (talk) 00:09, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Coco Fusco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]