Talk:Collaborative intelligence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconCognitive science Unassessed (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Hi, i removed the warnings for some minutes while a make some screenshots for a video to promote collaborative intelligence. As soon as I finish I'll put them back. --JoCalejandro (talk) 17:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Warnings where already putted back. Once the video is finished is goint to be uploaded to YouTube and I will link it form here. The video is going to be under Creative Commons, so you know...--JoCalejandro (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've been looking into the Wikipedia article for "Collective Intelligence" [[1]] and am not sure I see the difference between collective intelligence and collaborative intelligence. This article seems to imply that collaborative intelligence is specific to web/online activity. However, several sources I've been investigating refer to online intelligence as collective intelligence as well, and actually cite Wikipedia and Google as the best examples of this (see "Tapping into the Wisdom of Crowds" by Richard Naish, [2], "Mass Intelligence" by James Surwiecki [3], and "Collective Intelligence" by Michael Catelluccio [4]). Also, "Wikinomics" a book by Don Tapscott also refers to Wikipedia, Open Source communities, etc. as collective intelligence created through mass collaboration. I'm thinking that perhaps this article should maybe be incorporated into the "Collective Intelligence" article and use it as a way to emphasize more online examples of CI since that article is lacking in this area as it stands now.--IntelligenceGirl (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linearity[edit]

The current version of the article reads "Knowledge derived from collaborative efforts is increasing proportionally to the reach of the World Wide Web." The claim that knowledge grows in linear proportion to the reach of the Web is supported here by neither reason nor evidence, so I am removing the word "proportionally". Cat4567nip (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's not even clear that the net effect of internet on knowledge is positive. Have added reference to Is Google Making Us Stupid? Cat4567nip (talk) 10:39, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Collective versus individual[edit]

CQ doesn't imply that the knowledge and problem solving capability of a group is greater than the knowledge possessed by an individual group member. In a dysfunctional organization, it can be much less. I just found this presentation on Organizational Intelligence, extracted from a 2001 book. Cat4567nip (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Collaborative intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]