Talk:Colpomenia peregrina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This is just a start. Needs "Catagories" - but I don't know how to do these and more to be written. Osborne 08:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC) Taxobox...What is that? What about this:[reply]

According to Hardy, F,G. and Guiry, M.D. 2006. A Check-list and Atlas of the Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. British Phycological Society, London.

Division (Phylum): Heterokontophyceae

Class: Phaeophyceae

Order: Ectocarpales

Family: Scytosiphonaceae

Genus & Species Species: Colpomenia peregrina (Sauvagineau) Hamel

According to South, G.R. and Tittley and Tittley, I. 1986. A Ckecklist and Distributional Index of the Benthic Marine Algae of the North Atlantic Ocean. Huntsman Marine Laboratory and British Museum (Natural History),St Andrews and London. Division(Phylum): Chromophycota. Class: Phaeophyceae

Order: Dictyosiphonales

Family: Scytosiphonaceae

Genus & Species Species: Colpomenia peregrina (Sauvagineau) Hamel

Best wishes.Osborne 15:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

native distribution[edit]

This article (particularly the distribution section but also the lead) discusses the areas where this macroalgae has supposedly been recently introduced, but does not give any detail about its endemic native range. Cesiumfrog (talk) 21:45, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tomdamm (talk) 12:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)== Distribution ==[reply]

Here, 2008 is mentioned as first year of occurrence in Europe, but earlier in the article 2006 and 2007 are given as first year for two European areas.

References/notes[edit]

The References in this article are given as Notes and the Notes as References. I think these should be "switched". If you agree I would be grateful if you would do it for me. If I try I fear I will muck things up!!Osborne 21:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

I agree; those "references" look like "further reading" to me. I'll fix that. Huon (talk) 21:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Colpomenia peregrina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]