Talk:Comandanti Medaglie d'Oro-class destroyer

Comandanti Medaglie d'Oro-class destroyer has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 12, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / Italian / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Comandanti Medaglie d'Oro-class destroyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: L293D (talk · contribs) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really nice work here, getting an unreferenced stub to a detailed, accurate, and interesting article with really good images. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image review[edit]

Image copyright looks good, though this is the first time I see this copyright template.

Source review[edit]

Every thing good, as usual.

Lead[edit]

Lead looks good, I might suggest that you expand it a bit if you want, with perhaps some technical info (main battery caliber, torpedo tubes).

Design[edit]

whose ability to elevate to 45 degrees gave them a limited ability to deal with low-flying aircraft - just a detail, but could you clarify if the main battery's effectiveness against aircraft was better or worse than the preceding class. Does "limited" mean they had a limited ability to do something the previous class couldn't, or does it mean it's ability was limited compared to it predecessors?
- None of my references mention any ability of the earlier destroyers to engage aircraft aircraft at all. Since it's not mentioned I can't source any kind of comparison so I had to leave it out. 45° of elevation for these ships only allows the engagement of low-level aircraft at best.
Do we have the range of the torpedoes?
- Added.

The rest looks good. L293D (☎ • ✎) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review; see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, but could clarify what " for SI 270 torpedoes" means? The DD carried 270 torpedoes on board? L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's the name of the torpedo.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, great! L293D (☎ • ✎) 03:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.