Talk:Comma (disambiguation)
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
Disambiguation page style[edit]
WP:DAB#Disambiguation_pages explicitly says "Do not pipe the name of the links to the articles being listed." Additionally, by merging Cama, Kama and Karma (disambiguation) on to one line, you implied that they are linguistically similar terms as each other, but they are not, which is why they have their own disambig pages. — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 11:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was move to undisambiguated name as primary topic. A very sensible proposal and one of the few moves of its kind where what is the primary topic is not at all debatable. I have also fixed the hatnote and recast the dab page.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Primary topic[edit]
Isn't Comma (punctuation) the primary topic? Propose moving that to here, having moved this page to Comma (disambiguation). Any objection?--Kotniski (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. The punctuation mark is the main topic. Axl ¤ [Talk] 19:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
- That seems reasonable. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 01:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support move - certainly the punctuation is the primary usage PamD (talk) 08:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support. Words fail me. Of course the punctuation mark is the primary meaning! Andrewa (talk) 09:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support proposed move. Be bold! SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 19:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Support Duh... per WP:PRIMARYUSAGE. --Serge (talk) 01:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.