Talk:Commitment device

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Relation to precommitment article[edit]

The concept of "commitment devices" is sufficiently distinct from the concept of "precommitment" to deserve its own page. Numerous sources indicate it is sufficiently notable for a page to be started. It is an important concept in the fields of economics, decision-making, and game theory. Therefore, I initiated an independent page for it. -- Maxz0r Rackham

Dubner[edit]

Dubner is a journalist, not an economist - see http://stephenjdubner.com/bio.html 90.181.189.59 (talk) 16:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commitment device. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Example of Han Xin[edit]

I know, it's an OR argument. Anyway: Commitment devices are all around defined by steering your own future decisions in favour to a prefered one.

When Han Xin positioned his soldiers at the riverbank, he steered the decision (not fleeing but fighting) for other people.

In this reading every prison sentence would be a commitment device, and so much more actions of limiting other's decisions in future. I guess that's not in the spirit of the inventor. --Hæggis (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The same as Strotz' precommitment[edit]

There is an example given of Odysseus, whose symbolism was used first by Strotz, not Lewitt-Dubner. You should write that this technique was developed by Strotz ("Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Max", 1956). Pawel.jamiolkowski (talk) 04:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]