Talk:Committee for the Defence of Democracy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Semi-protecting the article[edit]

I see there have been many acts of vandalism recently. I think it might be a good idea to semi-protect this article. 62.233.223.132

There is no martial law in Poland however.[edit]

This phrase has been removed with a comment "no shit". There is no martial law in Poland however, so the Committee misuses the "resistor" symbol the same like some Polish nationalist misuse Polish anti-Nazi symbol Kotwica.Xx236 (talk) 08:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV - KOD follows the tradition of the former anti-communist Workers' Defence Committee[edit]

Workers' Defence Committee was illegal in a Communist country, the Committee for the Defence of Democracy does what it wants.

belonged to Founding members, now they are in the PiS administration.Xx236 (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

actions taken by the governing party, the first party - not true[edit]

The Law and Justice is supported by at least two small parties Poland Together and Solidarity for Poland, represented by a dozen of deputes, who belong to the LaJ fraction (club). Xx236 (talk) 07:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KOD follows the tradition ?[edit]

KOR helped prisoners and persecuted people, it didn't organize mass protests.Xx236 (talk) 07:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Guardian plagiarized this article[edit]

So, am I right to see that this Feb 26 article has copied verbatim from Committee for the Defence of Democracy "became the first party in post-communist Polish history to control an absolute majority of the seats in the Polish Parliament and the Presidency at the same time. While the protest movement has taken issue with a number of PiS-sponsored initiatives"? Damn, even top tier publications have no standards if they copy stuff like that. Sigh. PS. Moonriddengirl agrees with me: User_talk:Moonriddengirl#The_Guardian_plagiarizing_us.3F. There is probably a template for that. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Supporters[edit]

The phrase Many politicians, especially Ryszard Petru, presented their critiques of the government doesn't say anything about supporting KOD. Not only the KOD criticises the government.Xx236 (talk) 11:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this is generic and can be removed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:49, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Coalition[edit]

I don't know if the Coalition [1] works but it seems that Grzegorz Schetyn doesn't support the KOD.Xx236 (talk) 06:50, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Supporters[edit]

This is a selection and there is always a question - why these people?
Krystyna Janda's theater was financially supported by the former government and obtained about 10% only this year. Does it make Janda neutral?Xx236 (talk) 06:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

The text misinforms, it present's KOD's POV only.

The destruction of the Tribunal was started by Platforma Obywatelska, who nominated five judges.
240 000 is a pro-KOD estimate.
KOD was supported by "Gazeta Wyborcza", the biggest Polish daily at that time.Xx236 (talk) 06:59, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Le Monde didn't vist Warsaw to understand Polish problesm, it publishes opinions of a former Wyborcza internet edition journalist Jakub Iwaniuk (and Maja Żółtowska).Xx236 (talk) 07:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 4 March[edit]

I would make a separate page about today's march. 2A02:3030:804:693B:1:0:5BEA:CB14 (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]