Talk:Community Living Ontario

Community Living Ontario is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

no consensus, 30 October 2008 (UTC), see discussion.
keep, 29 July 2008, see discussion.

Hang on[edit]

This is a notable organisation that was subject to recent COI edits. I have reverted those edits. DoubleBlue (Talk) 03:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I guess I messed up, I wrote what I thought was a decent entry in place of the old mess, but it got deleted. I don't know what a COI is, but I guess that was me? I wrote it under a login name that was rejected, not sure if that makes a difference. Anyway, I thought my version under the Communitylivingcanada login was a lot better than the one that is there now, and it's also quite accurate. Sorry, I am new to this, just trying to help with this page, as this is a major notable organization that should definitely be in wikipedia. Inclusionforeveryone (talk) 20:57, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your desire to help us improve the encyclopedia and I agree that this article could use a lot of expansion. WP:COI is our Conflict of Interest guideline and of course your former username suggested a conflict of interest and it was written in such a way that it was perceived as more of an advertisement than a neutral encyclopedic article. My complete revert was meant to be a quick way to re-establish a version that formerly had consensus and could avoid a speedy deletion and thought we could re-insert your additions in a more neutral and balanced tone when there was more time. Thanks for being calm and understanding and not getting frustrated at this process. It is sometimes difficult not to seem bitten as a newcomer to the 'pedia but please be sure that we welcome your input and our brash actions just seek to uphold the Five pillars. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 05:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I realize I have little idea what I am doing as far as being a wikipedian, but it's ridiculous that Community Living Ontario is being challenged as a legit entry, this is a HUGE organization and hugely important to boot. I tried a few more additions, I think it's important to note the size and scope. The local associations are significant in their own right so to be challenging the provincial association is kinda goofy. Maybe their execs are all on the aging side so they aren't with it as far as wikipedia goes, but that doesn't mean the org isn't significant :-) Inclusionforeveryone (talk) 06:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Community Living Ontario. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]