Talk:Commutator (electric)

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Electrical engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

About the rating[edit]

Although there is decent amount of text there is a lot of redundancy so I think this article currently still qualifies as a stub. Specifically the last paragraph of the intro and the second paragraph of Composition of a Commutator are almost identical, but even much of the remaining text is largely a restatement of this same information on how they are constructed. More coverage should also be given to the longevity of the device, its history (both development and use), and something should be said about the efficiency of the device. -AndrewBuck 15:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote most of the article partially addressing the issues mentioned above but I still think further attention is required. -AndrewBuck 14:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs still more work. And references. I was going to say a commutator is a required feature of direct-current machines but I suppose there are homopolar machines. --Wtshymanski 02:22, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intro[edit]

"A commutator is an electrical switch that periodically reverses the current in an electric motor or electrical generator."

no:

a motor/commutator based synchronous rectifier does not reverse the current - in fact it has no effect on the current in the motor at all.
a dc generator uses a commutator to avoid reversal of current, though its more complex of course.

"By reversing the current in the moving coil of a motor's armature, a steady rotating force torque is produced."

no. This would only be true if all the following were true (and they cant be):

communtator timing were perfect, with no gap and no overlap
Motor current remained absolutely constant, which is impossible since windings have inductance
Magnetic circuits were arranged to ensure constant torque despite changing rotational position.

Tabby (talk) 02:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blinking GIF animation replacement[edit]

Not only is that flashing, pulsating, blinking GIF animation visually annoying to look at, but it is also fundamentally incorrect since it has a dead spot in the rotation, as the brushes cross the insulated midsection.

The simplest practical commutator has at least three segments, and the brushes must normally span two segments and short at least one winding, in order to maintain current flow in the other two windings.

I am going to see how hard it is to create a correct 3-segment animation, and with less annoying flickering. DMahalko (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the simplest practical commutator has two segments connected to two windings on the armature. This arrangement is quite practical and works perfectly satisfactorily in a dynamo. However, as noted, it is impractical in a motor because it would not be self starting. An armature constructed this way is knowns as a "Siemens 'H' type". 86.150.65.44 (talk) 11:25, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed -- horrid animation that distracts greatly while trying to read and contemplate the information in the article. Wikisocko (talk) 23:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Laboratory commutators[edit]

Can anyone identify Ruhmkorff and Pohl? Ruhmkorff is probably Heinrich Daniel Ruhmkorff. Pohl might be Robert Pohl but I think he is probably too late. If he was born in 1884, I think it unlikely his invention would have appeared in a text book as early as 1905. Biscuittin (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect it is Johann Ehrenfried Pohl. I will try to find out. Roberttherambler (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is Georg Friedrich Pohl (1788-1849). He is in German Wikipedia. [1] The relevant passage is "1825 erfand er das Gyrotrop" which Google translates as "In 1825 he invented the Gyrotrop". There seem to be three words for commutator in German: "Kommutator", "Gyrotrop" and "Stromwender". Stromwender actually translates as "power inverter" which would have a different meaning now from the meaning it had in 1825. Roberttherambler (talk) 16:24, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is yet solid enough to put in the article. Roberttherambler (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced Gyrotrop is a commutator. See Gyrotropic. Roberttherambler (talk) 23:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Electroconductive liquids commutator[edit]

Some infos about the use of ionic liquids and liquid metals and alloys (other than mercury) would be better to be added.--188.26.22.131 (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sounds good. Some of the very first commutators were in fact built using mercury pools in laboratory experiments. This website lists several such devices.

http://www.sparkmuseum.com/MOTORS.HTM

DMahalko (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that mercury was the only liquid metal available at that time.--188.26.22.131 (talk) 11:36, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brushless commutator[edit]

Does the presence of liquid metals commutator in a motor make it a brushless motor?--86.125.151.236 (talk) 12:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

image[edit]

just an image ... may be useful. From U.S. patent 673,517.--J. D. Redding 02:23, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date information[edit]

I note that a few sections of this article are taken from a reference that is dated 1917. It may come as no surprise that there have been a few developments in motor and generator technology since that time. Although the field in a machine does skew with load, it is no longer necessary to position the brushes away from their normal position. Instead additional windings (called interpoles) are used to skew the field back to its original position (they are a sort of auxiliary series field winding positioned between the main field poles such as to oppose the skew). Though I have reference works, I do not have the facilities or the time to produce the revised diagrams (or even the ability to upload them) that would be required to rewrite this part of the article. 86.150.65.44 (talk) 13:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The brush-shifting information is not out of date, and is relevant to devices without interpoles.

An additional section should be created that discusses interpoles, however my web searches for in-depth technical discussions and descriptions of interpoles are not turning up anything useful. If you can please cite any detailed technical documentation which includes diagrams and field patterns, that would be most helpful for improving this article.

DMahalko (talk) 19:54, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Commutator (electric). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]