Talk:Comparison of mobile Internet Relay Chat clients
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 August 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 4 November 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comparison of mobile Internet Relay Chat clients article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Clients to Add[edit]
- AndroIRC (http://www.androirc.com)
- AndroidIRC (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.countercultured.irc)
- liteIRC (http://xerodox.com/liteirc/)
- Rice IRC
- SimpleIRC (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Simpleirc/108409089272899)
- TapChat (http://tapchatapp.com/)
I tried to add these, but all that happened was the table formatting got really messed up — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.94.38.34 (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Android IRC isn't free[edit]
I know for a fact (cause I have it) that Android IRC for G1's isnt free. It costs $4.99 Lexygrace (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Maybe there is more than one program called "Android IRC"? But all I found was this one. Quoting: http://androidirc.net/index.php
Is it free?
Yes
- Can you point to a source about the Android IRC client you use? -- intgr [talk] 17:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
where is chatZilla? In my experience that is more common than most of the irc clients listed here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.212.106.160 (talk) 23:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Non-notable[edit]
I propose that all applications listed without their own freestanding Wikipedia articles are considered insufficiently notable for inclusion on the basis that a simple stub article with a couple of reasonable citations is all that would be required to substantiate notability. Fæ (talk) 13:09, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but no. If you consider this to be a "Comparison article" (as I and many others do, since it contains clearly defined comparative elements and isn't a "List of wikilinks intended for navigational purposes", then WP:NNC applies. If you consider this to be a "list" then this idea was rejected at the Inclusion criteria for Lists RFC and follow up/ongoing discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability. This has also already been rejected at Talk:Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients and this comparison is a split from that one. Mobile clients have different requirements from PC-based clients so trying to include them there did not work too well. Many of these clients have been covered in published works and other reliable sources, but presumably due to a lack of time no one has written stub articles for many of them. Some would also be better off as redirects to a parent article. Each case is different and will need to be evaluated separately. --Tothwolf (talk) 14:05, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Cleanup done[edit]
Hi all,
I have recently completed a cleanup of Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients. If any there is any issues with this cleanup, please leave a message on my talk page.
Thank you.
FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 18:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Unassessed Internet articles
- Unknown-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Unassessed software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles