Talk:Comparison of music streaming services

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove “HiFi” from the “lossless” table.[edit]

This may be misleading as there are formats (namely Master Quality Authenticated) that are higher fidelity than a standard 320kbps MP3 type file, but are not lossless. 120.20.20.59 (talk) 03:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Sebastián Arena... 13:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huawei Music[edit]

Huawei Music is a thing Alexifeu (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-Res available column is redundant[edit]

All services that have Lossless available are necessarily also Hi-Res available (since Lossless is Hi-Res), and there are no examples of Hi-Res available that don't have Lossless available currently, therefore that column is completely redundant. YellowJelly (talk) 20:00, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fully agree. Sebastián Arena... 13:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Free access available - Tidal[edit]

Tidal doesn't have free access available. At least, not for all the users of the service.

So, that piece of information should be changed. Sebastián Arena... 13:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]