Talk:Comparison of web template engines
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comparison of web template engines article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 60 days  |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | The Kid (templating language) article was blanked on 2024-03-23 and that title now redirects to Comparison of web template engines. The contents of the former article are available in the redirect's history; for the discussion at that location, see the redirect's talk page. |
Template system?? (redirecting here)[edit]
SEE Template System redirection problems on Talk:Template#Template_system.3F.3F_.28redirecting_here.29
Template system?? (redirecting here)[edit]
SEE Template System redirection problems on Talk:Template#Template_system.3F.3F_.28redirecting_here.29
Any indication on how well maintained the template engine is[edit]
It would be nice if there was some kind of indication of how well maintained the template engine is. For instance, Apache Velocity has not had an update in the past 13 years and has everal vulnerabilities (see https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.velocity/velocity/1.7).
This could be done by adding a column that shows when the last update was if it is no longer actively maintained. For template engines that are actively maintained, it would be too much of a hassle to update this every time if it's not automated, so it would be enough to say "Actively maintained" (maybe with a link to where the latest version can be found). 2001:1C01:3B1E:FE00:59FD:68C5:F95E:ECD2 (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)