Talk:Competition Cams

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Competition Cams article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 September 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Motorsport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

In what way is this copyright infringement? Is that a joke? I'm assuming that because you couldn't find any other reason to delete this article, you created one that doesn't exist. Please inform me in what way this was copyright infringement. --Jabarke1 (talk) 18:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree!! When a child is in middle school, they learn how to properly cite their information, which is done here. You are crying copyright infringement, which means someone didn't put the copyright or trademarkings on a company or referenced site. BUT, if someone were to do that, it would be against your rules and regulations. Please explain in detail what is meant by your statement of copyright infringement & do not reference the legal jargon.--Trenay (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(trenay_)

You were wrong to delete this page the first time, which is the reason for its reposting. Some of the editing that has been done DOES address previous issues. It is not copyright infringement, blatant advertising, or any other pathetic "criteria for speedy deletion" that the editors have posted in the past or present. Thank you.

--Jabarke1 (talk) 19:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What is up with this? You got busted with your first reason so you have to talk in circles as to why you want to delete the page? What do you have against this company? Other companies are listed on this site.--Trenay (talk) 19:14, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I tagged the article with an incorrect speedy deletion notice. I meant to tag it with a {{db-spam}}. However, I see now that another editor has tagged it as recreation of deleted material. However, it seems the AFD was closed earlier as the article was deleted as blatant advertising. Sending it through a full cycle of [wp:AFD|articles for deletion]] would seem to be the correct course of action. -- Whpq (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Speedy Delete (G4 - repost of deleted material)[edit]

I've removed the G4 speedy notice (and the associated hangon). G4 applies if the article has been previously deleted through AFD. However, a review of the pervious AFD shows that it was speedily deleted there. So G4 does not apply, and another editor has put it up for AFD again. -- Whpq (talk) 19:44, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq, thank you for taking the time to consider this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trenay (talk • contribs) 20:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you keeping an open mind. If you look at the SEMA market research page on their site, you will see that this article is well-researched, neutral fact. Thanks again.

--Jabarke1 (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been completely rewritten and re-cited for both notability and neutrality. Please take time to view the article, its sources, and its purpose. Thanks to those who have changed their vote.

--Jabarke1 (talk) 21:44, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Competition Cams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080926194837/http://offroadbusinessmag.off-road.com:80/offroadbusinessmag/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=432470&sk=&date=&pageID=2 to http://offroadbusinessmag.off-road.com/offroadbusinessmag/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=432470&sk=&date=&pageID=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:27, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Competition Cams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081123091642/http://www.compcams.com./ to http://www.compcams.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]