Talk:Confrontation Clause

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Constitution Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Constitution, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Constitution of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States ConstitutionWikipedia:WikiProject United States ConstitutionTemplate:WikiProject United States ConstitutionUnited States Constitution articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) thing(s).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Untitled[edit]

This article should be deleted and merged into the existing subtopic on the sixth amendment's article. Rlove (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This amendment may have originally been intended to preserve the right to challenge witnesses to a duel as an alternative to court trial. However, this was never legally tested in the context of the time and society which passed the amendment. Within ever changing social rules dueling quickly incorporated a gentlemen's right to refuse - though that was often taken as an admission of guilt. The accused was often acquitted in early disputed trials based on public knowledge of such refusals to duel -- thus it was to the accused advantage to let refusals to duel stand. Dueling quickly lost favor as too aristocratic in the early 1800s and was eventually prohibited as if not entitled under the amended Constitution. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.23.124.142 (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confrontation Clause. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150603192937/http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4876568856193042363&q=zanders+v+united+states+confrontation+clause&hl=en&as_sdt=20004 to http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4876568856193042363&q=zanders+v+united+states+confrontation+clause&hl=en&as_sdt=20004

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:10, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Overview of different countries[edit]

Currently it is very US specific. I would like to know how this is handled in other countries. Thanks, Bernburgerin (talk) 07:45, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Current controversy regarding impeachment and the right to meet an accuser[edit]

There is currently a loud debate at the national level regarding whether or not President Trump has a constitutional right to meet his accuser, the whistleblower who remains anonymous. https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/06/politics/sixth-amendment-require-whistle-blower-to-face-donald-trump-fact-check/index.html https://www.npr.org/2019/10/01/766176669/legal-experts-say-the-right-to-confront-accusers-does-not-apply-to-impeachment Shouldn't this article make some reference to this? I came here looking for information and didn't find much to help me. Marcusreese (talk) 15:55, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Marcusreese:, the article should not make reference to this as Trump's claims at the time were related to impeachment proceedings and the Confrontation Clause explicitly references the words "in all criminal prosecutions." Muttnik talk 23:56, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]