Talk:ConnCAN
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Question about this piece[edit]
Nine of the ten references provided for this article are from the organization itself. The tenth is a dead link. Is this a legitimate article?
Thanks. Critthink100 (talk) 20:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Contrary views on ConnCAN reports[edit]
This review is by Bruce Baker, a reputable school finance analyst that specializes in statistics. The original link (not shown) was to a top ten educational bunkum reports at NPEC. This is not unusual as the majority of right-leaning policy relies on unreliable work. [1] Bob Calder 00:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by B calder (talk • contribs)