Talk:ConnectiCon

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comics: United States Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

This article more than meets the standards of other conventions allowed on WP[edit]

So, how many outside sources are enough to constitute notability? ConnectiCon has more attendees than other conventions listed on WP, and has more references than other conventions listed on WP. So why is there a want to delete this article when others which don't meet the same standards are welcomed? Iwriteforme (talk) 16:49, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Connecticon is notable and should be allowed to have an article on Wikipedia[edit]

but I think that this article reads way too much like an advertisement flier and not enough like an objective accounting of what the convention is and does. (Some anonymous CT resident)