Talk:Connecticut River Line

Trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Track map[edit]

Has anyone seen a track map or ETT for the rebuilt line? I checked the STB filing but it's listed as pending; no doubt because of the expedited nature. Mackensen (talk) 12:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

Thank you for removing my edits and references when you created this article from the old one. Now it looks like I never contributed at all LReyome254 (talk) 01:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for any harm that I may have caused to you when I created Connecticut River Line. It was not intended. When I split Connecticut River Railroad and created Connecticut River Line I attempted to follow the guidelines laid out in WP:CORRECTSPLIT. Please tell me what I should have done to preserve your edits and the edits of others from the original page.FFM784 (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recall the line from the old edit notice - "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then don't submit it here" .FFM784 did just fine with the split; one of the citations you added, LReyome254, is still in the article, and the other has been replaced by newer sources. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:11, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station listing[edit]

Should the station listing include former stations? I believe it should, in parallel with other articles about railway lines that include former stations. It would be easy to cite from RS (I have the Karr book already used in the article). Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:22, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it should. Also note that the Pan Am employee timetable for this line also shows stations that are not passenger stations, these include East Northfield, CPR 36, CPF 385, SPR 35, CPR 33, South Deerfield, North Hatfield, Hatfield, CPR 18, CPR 16, CPR 9, Riverside, and CPR 1. Adding this level of detail might be unnecessary but I thought I would mention it. I would be happy to add this information with a citation if others felt that it should be added to the article.FFM784 (talk) 10:58, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]