Talk:Construction of the Lackawanna Cut-Off

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 29 August 2013 by reviewer Jamesx12345 (talk · contribs).

New Jersey

This redirect is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles

Trains

Trains Portal

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Let's rename this article[edit]

I propose to rename this article "Construction of the Lackawanna Cut-Off" because a) it's not just about the contractors and b) it should follow WP naming convention (cf, Construction of the World Trade Center, Construction of Mount Rushmore, Construction of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, etc.). PRRfan (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. It's presently not exactly something I'd search for. James^x12345 17:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good job.WallyFromColumbia (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cost of Construction[edit]

Here's my issue with trying to convert 1911 dollars to 2013 dollars for a railroad project based on an inflation algorithm: it's meaningless. Various estimates I've seen put the cost of reproducing the line, assuming it could be done at all, at well over a billion US dollars. As a result, I'd suggest keeping the 1911 figure and then just simply state that the cost of building the line in the present day is unknown.WallyFromColumbia (talk) 22:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should we keep the article or combine it with the main article?[edit]

I would keep this article for now. There are a number of old construction photos that need to be uploaded, and they would be more appropriately placed here, rather than the main article, in my opinion. Any thoughts? WallyFromColumbia (talk) 17:56, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]