Talk:Content strategy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction articles

Internet Mid‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Steppitup02. Peer reviewers: JohnWilfong, Lwalsh1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External Links Section[edit]

Some of the listed resources in external links are blogs run by companies or consultants. I see that some are being deleted and others allowed to stay, despite equal popularity. This seems to me to be a breach of the assumption of good faith at best and an attempt to manipulate traffic at worst.

A review of Wikipedia policy suggests that none of the blogs should, in fact, be linked. From the page about appropriate external links:

Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc, controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for biographies.)

Corporate blogs might be except from the above restriction, but they serve primarily as promotional tools for the companies who publish them.

In conclusion, unless I see a policy-based counterargument on this page in the next few weeks, I'm going to pull all blog links from this article's external links.

--Lumin (talk) 06:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the link to the Google Group removed? That is an open forum, not owned or managed by any corporation.

--Mirka 06:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]