Talk:Controversies in professional sumo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Controversies in professional sumo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I always wondered how Sumo would be described by 22nd century feminists using The Huffington Post as their reference material. And now I know  :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.71.92.57 (talk) 13:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Controversies in professional sumo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:47, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023 - Kokonoe Stable[edit]

Would this incident qualify to be listed here, or does it not carry much weight compared to everything else listed? JRHorse (talk) 13:37, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even in the light of the new information released today, I don't think this news should be mentioned in the article. Correct me if I'm wrong, but we should be concentrating on the problems inherent in sumo and here we have an underage wrestler being sanctioned for something unrelated to past sumo scandals. At this stage my opinion would therefore be no, although I reserve the right to change my mind if the wrestler concerned (who was suspended and more or less forced to retire) subsequently decides to lodge a complaint against the sumo association. - OtharLuin (talk) 07:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That is fair. More issues came to light today it seems, so perhaps if it really gets out of hand in some way, we look into it again? JRHorse (talk) 10:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I'd recommend, yes :) - OtharLuin (talk) 11:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]