Talk:Cooking Mama: Cook Off

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (8 participants)
Dancing Stage Max (3 participants)
Bez-MX (9 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)
International Hobo (2 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Notability[edit]

Video game that has not been developed is probably not notable. If achieves notability, then article.14:38, 14 May 2006 (UTC) :) Dlohcierekim 14:39, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are lots of pages of games taht have not been developed yet, and they are all still existing. Just look here for a list. I think that this page should definately not be deleted. -AtionSong 15:18, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've edited it a bit. It's still small, but it'll surely grow as more information comes out. First time I use a talk page, I hope I'm doing this right. -braulio09 09:56, 30 September 2006 (GMT-7)

Title[edit]

This game is called "Cooking Mama: Cooking with International Friends"! not "Cooking Mama: Cook Off"!! mattiator 02:28, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but the name's changed. Read the official press release --El benito 06:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Number of recipes[edit]

Are you serious? Only 55 recipes? Is that the number of all the recipes, or just the confirmed ones. Because the first game had more recipes. -- (unsigned)

While some sites are quoting "over 300 recipes", I believe this is a garbling of the "over 300 ingredients" press release information. However, the 55 recipes may be only those which can be done without using the "international friends" mode; it may very well be that there are 55 recipes plus the international recipes. -- Slordak 21:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you mean univercal recipes?

The box states that there are 55 recipes and more than 300 ingredients. CJ 23:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We should add a list of recipes. (Superjustinbros. 20:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

No, we shouldn't. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --pIrish 22:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date[edit]

The release dates for North america at many sites range from March 20 to April 17. Any official word? -matija

First, please sign your messages. Second, it's March 20. I was at an EBGames earlier talking to an employee about upcoming Wii games. They're set to receive their shipment of the game on March 20. For a source that's not original research, see this site. The date is listed in the game details box. --pIrish 22:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for not signing. Also, I looked up the date on the official publisher website, which links to a preorder date of the 20th, so it's pretty certainly coming tomorrow :) yay -matija on march 19

Images of Characters[edit]

Can someone look on the web and see if they can find an image of each of the characters? Superjustinbros. 00:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You've already been told there is no reason for having all possible information related to the game in wikipedia. This is the second time. Please stop. The information is not relevant. --194.202.236.116 11:58, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean post them on Wikipedia, I ment a site for me to look at. Be more specific next time 194.202.236.116. Oh by the way, what happened to the Japanese site? Superjustinbros. 22:39, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cooking Mama 2.jpg[edit]

Image:Cooking Mama 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]