Talk:Copenhagen Business School

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Copenhagen Business School article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Denmark

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

2007[edit]

I removed the statement that CBS graduates are some of the most sought after. No statistics are available to support it. Furthermore, it seems that the same user has removed a similar statement from the article: Roskilde University. Wikipedia should not be used for PR-purposes. User:Sir48, Denmark

There have been some organisational changes to CBS recently (e.g. there is only one faculty now). The article needs to reflect this. 194.255.106.26 21:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added updates - deleted commercialized stuff[edit]

Hi CBSCommunication, Just added your updates in numbers and figure. But deleted the promotion stuff, as wikipedia is not for direct marketing - should be allright now.(Jsz2010 (talk) 05:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Please add[edit]

Unfortunately, the article is blocked. Could you either unblock the article or add the following sentence: Copenhagen Business School has been ranked #59 by Times Higher Education in its Most International Universities in the World 2016 ranking. Source: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/200-most-international-universities-world-2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.23.200 (talk) 08:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. — Train2104 (t • c) 05:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction and ranking dispute[edit]

Hi.

Over the past month or so, there has been a big dispute over whether it should be stated that CBS is regarded as one of the best business schools in the world, and whether its highest ranking should be stated in the Introduction.

I keep getting the argument that my statement is "biased" and that CBS is not included in the top in various rankings; apparently the people who keep saying that are not very good at researching.

Rankings

Also, CBS is purely a business/social sciences school, that it does not appear in general rankings. But as you can see, it is both ranked in FT, QS, ARWU, while also being in the top 10 in various one. So excuse me but this is not a "promo" or whatever, it is stating a fact by also putting up references, both about the actual rankings, and CBS being one of the best in the world and Europe. "Biased" would be if I talked about its "fame" without me having any references; something that I am not doing.

The other argument is that "rankings belong under rankings". The reference of the rankings I add in the introduction is just a direct reference to it being one of the best business schools. Also, I don't see the same people altering other pages of universities having the same structure, i.e. Bocconi University or MIT Sloan.

So I would like some valid arguments to that, instead of hearing the same, false arguments.

Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.98.122.70 (talk) 12:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 March 2017[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi.

There has been a big dispute over whether it should be stated that CBS is regarded as one of the best business schools in the world, and whether its highest ranking should be stated in the Introduction.

I keep getting the argument that my statement is "biased" and that CBS is not included in the top in various rankings; apparently, the people who keep saying that are not very good at researching.

Rankings

Also, CBS is purely a business/social sciences school, that it does not appear in general rankings. But as you can see, it is both ranked in FT, QS, ARWU, while also being in the top 10 in various one. So excuse me but this is not a "promo" or whatever, it is stating a fact by also putting up references, both about the actual rankings, and CBS being one of the best in the world and Europe. "Biased" would be if I talked about its "fame" without me having any references; something that I am not doing.

The other argument is that "rankings belong under rankings". The reference of the rankings I add in the introduction is just a direct reference to it being one of the best business schools. Also, I don't see the same people altering other pages of universities having the same structure, i.e. Bocconi University or MIT Sloan.

So I would like some valid arguments to that, instead of hearing the same, false arguments. 212.98.122.70 (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copenhagen Business School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150803210808/http://bss.au.dk/currently/news/news-item/artikel/amba-accreditation-for-school-of-business-and-social-sciences/ to http://bss.au.dk/currently/news/news-item/artikel/amba-accreditation-for-school-of-business-and-social-sciences/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2018[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change "however, it wasn't until 1920" in the introduction to "however, it was not until 1920" per Wikipedia:Contractions. 5.151.0.115 (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done as this is a minor edit only. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please add tag to main page[edit]

Thanks, 205.189.94.17 (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]