Talk:Copts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Copt)
Former good article nomineeCopts was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 17, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Why do references start from 25?![edit]

why do references start from 25?! Aryamohamdyan (talk) 15:49, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the infobox on the right side of the screen; you shall see 24 references. Aearthrise (talk) 16:10, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted references[edit]

The references I added yesterday to the article were removed and the re-organization of the article was reverted, then I received a warning that I may be blocked! Can someone please explain this to me? Epenkimi (talk) 02:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User User:Fragrant Peony is insisting to engage in edit warring and continues to revert everything I post. Can an administrator please get involved here? Is there a way to reach out to administrator to look at this behavior? Thank you Epenkimi (talk) 11:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flag[edit]

I suspect that this flag is the creation of an individual neo-vexillology enthusiast, & does not represent any organised body of Copts. I could very well be wrong! Does anyone have any info on a source? Pathawi (talk) 17:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I traced this down. It was made by a a group called Free Copts which may have never been more than one person, & which may have never had more than an on-line presence. Their site has been down for several years now. I can't find any indication that they ever had significant influence among Copts. I don't think this flag should be taken to represent the ethnicity as a whole. Pathawi (talk) 00:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - let's zap it. Many Wikipedians think everything should have a Western-style flag, but .... Johnbod (talk) 02:58, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reference to "Nisan Mordechai"[edit]

"The Copts were severely affected by Nasser's nationalization policies, though they represented about 10 to 20 percent of the population."

This sentence cites "Minorities in the Middle East: A History of Struggle and Self-Expression, 2nd Edition" by Mordechai Nisan (Author)

The author of this citation, Nisan Mordechai, is described as a "counter-jihadist" and an adherent of Bat Ye'or, who promotes the Eurabia conspiracy theory. This is a far-right, anti-Muslim conspiracy theory that posits that globalist entities, led by French and Arab powers, aim to Islamize and Arabize Europe, thereby weakening its existing culture and undermining its previous alliances with the United States and Israel.

I am wondering if a better citation and author can be used related to Egypt's Coptic community under Nasser, as well as additional context. Gamalny (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is Todros ch. 3-4[edit]

The Todros ch. 3-4 citation seems to have been added to this article back in revision https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copts&oldid=569446271 back in August 2013 by @Rjensen It also appears in Christianity in Egypt and probably elsewhere. It needs to have a full reference beyond just an author name. Erp (talk) 03:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it's probably at type-o for the Tadros book that appears in Further Reading in that 2013 version of the article. There appears to have been some messy subsequent editing that retains a reference to Samuel Tadros in the current version of the article but replaces the formal citation with something else. Pathawi (talk) 12:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]