Talk:Corby railway station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Corby railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

City sizes[edit]

The article claims that Herten in Germany and Łomża in Poland are both larger than Corby. However, taking the figures presented in the respective Wikipedia articles, the population figures are 72,218 for Corby, 62,779 for Łomża and 61,821 for Herten. This makes Corby the largest of them by some margin. Renerpho (talk) 05:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This might have been true when it was originally written, but, now that Corby again has a station, the sourced comment that it was "one of the largest towns in Europe without a railway station" makes the essential point, so these extra details may as well be deleted. Blurryman (talk) 19:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to organise this article[edit]

I feel the article should be re-arranged a bit given the reopening is now "History", and the "Future" consists of the improved services which have already happened, and the East West Rail Northern Route, which didn't happen. However I'm not sure how best to do this, if I simply merged the Reopening into the History header, it would make the history section very long. Thoughts? NemesisAT (talk) 14:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Electrification etc[edit]

Hope you all dont mind, but I have added a whole new section on electrification GRALISTAIR (talk) 02:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]