Talk:Core self-evaluations

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Core self-evaluations article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 22 October 2011 by reviewer Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs).

Psychology C‑class Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technical language[edit]

Headings such as "Conceptualization of the core self-evaluations trait" and "Relationship between the core self-evaluation traits" are off-putting. We need more accessible alternatives. MartinPoulter (talk) 11:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science paper at Wikipedia[edit]

This reads like a science paper planted at Wikipedia by small group of researcher for a small group of researchers with incoming links from See also sections. Otherwise, this text is an orphan.

The text was pasted almost ready by Gmukskr in 2011 and has changed little since except for cosmetic details. The long list of references has been connected with portions of the text (originally, references were just a long list of publications). Nearly entire Gmukskr's contribution to Wikipedia is about "core self-evaluations", and a few forays to other topics include texts about "core self-evaluations".

Researchers mentioned in the text are: Bandura (once), Mount (once), and Judge (10 times). This is a bit out of balance.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MilanCela (talk • contribs) 09:03, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]