Talk:Corporate liability

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Removed section[edit]

I have removed this section because sovereign immunity is not an element of liability, but of jurisdiction to adjudicate. In addition, almost everything that a corporation could do that would give rise to liability would not be covered under the restrictive theory of sovereign immunity, which is accepted by nearly all states. See Restat. 3d of Foreign Relations § 451:

Under international law, a state or state instrumentality is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of another state, except with respect to claims arising out of activities of the kind that may be carried on by private persons.

Thus, unless the corporation was engaged in activities different in kind from those undertaken by private persons (such as espionage, terrorism, etc.), sovereign immunity would not apply. I believe that these circumstances are sufficiently rare that sovereign immunity does not bear mentioning here. Though the Restatement summarizes how international law is incorporated into US law, the European Convention on State Immunity (1972) also codifies the restrictive theory, as do the British State Immunity Act of 1978, Canadian State Immunity Act of 1982, and Australian Foreign States Immunities Act of 1985. Danculley 04:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

State immunity[edit]

Some corporations are established and operated by sovereign states and, as such, they may enjoy sovereign immunity for some of their acts and omissions.