Talk:Corroboree frog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Isn't p. corroboree also found in Victoria (Mt Buller?)Lizby 11:43, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Both corroboree frogs are only found in NSW and ACT. You may be thinking of the Baw Baw Frog, another endangered alpine species which is only found in VIC.--Tnarg 12345 09:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement Drive[edit]

Frog has been nominated to be improved by WP:IDRIVE. Help us improve it and support Frog with your vote on WP:IDRIVE. --Fenice 07:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC) i thought that the southern was endangered and the northern was only vunerable, is that true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.14.47 (talk) 01:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split[edit]

This should be split into separate articles for the two species. Hesperian 04:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - closely related enough for one article.--Kudpung (talk) 19:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - We have seperate articles for both species of Dwarf Siren even though they are similar enough for individual articles. TheDarkMaster2 (talk) 19:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Corroboree frog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed split?[edit]

This was brought up 12 years ago but merits a heftier discussion. I propose splitting this page into two, one for each species of corroboree frog: Southern corroboree frog and Northern corroboree frog. I don't have an optinion on whether this page (corroboree frog) should be turned into a redirect or maintained as an article (maybe worth doing if the corroboree frogs are a monophyletic group?). Comments welcome! —Collint c 19:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - Due to differing statuses and conservation efforts for each species. Happily888 (talk) 04:05, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- There is enough information to split it into two articles and they have different conservation efforts. Gusfriend (talk) 07:42, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - split as per reasons above and consistency of form with other TOL articles where all smaller stubs are acceptable. Loopy30 (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support- no time to do it myself right now though, so have just added a redirect for the southern one so at least people can find their way here. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - I can do this in a bit Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • update - have started stubs but 1am here and I need to sleep. more tomorow Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:05, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Corroboree_frog&oldid=1195584181"