Talk:Cortes Bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

If Bishop Rock was at a depth of 98 feet, neither the clipper ship Bishop nor the Enterprise would have struck it and it wouldn't be buoyed because it wouldn't be a hazard to any shipping. It's been many years since I was in the area, but I believe the correct depth of the rock is about 9 ft. The U.S. Coast Pilot 7 39th edition says a wreck covered 3 ft 200 yards from the rock itself is the shoalest point on Cortes Bank.

Additionally, I'm not sure why a spot called 9 Fathom Bank (54 feet) would also be 98 feet deep. Someone with access to a chart could check this.RZid 07:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Republic of the reefs link is down, and appears to be a permanent situation. --RaffiKojian (talk) 16:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather see a Geography section than the trivia sounding stuff that is in the article now[edit]

Part of that is that I noticed the region looks like a flow of some sort in Google Earth. Will (Talk - contribs) 10:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

== I will post some copyright legal photos from the Bank's history in the near future.
== The information on Bishop Rock being 98 feet deep has been corrected.
Chris Dixon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghostwavebook (talkcontribs) 19:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cortes Bank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cortes Bank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]