Talk:Counter-IED efforts

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Counter-IED efforts article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

NATO (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles

Terrorism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

IED[edit]

The explanation of what IED stands for needs to be at the start of the article.

Aisteco (talk) 14:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I spelled it out at the first mention of "IED" and likified it to the explanation.

dbabbitt (talk) 14:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good.

Aisteco (talk) 23:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aerostat[edit]

Looking good so far. I made a couple corrections/modifications/additions to the Aerostat portion and will spend more time on this tomorrow after I reference classification of some things I'd like to add.Mcgyver2k (talk) 21:41, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I would recommend swapping that photo of the JLENS (Radar) Aerostat out with one that we actually use for C-IED. The JLENS is not used in combat theaters (yet) and doesn't provide any EO/IR (Optical) capabilities. It's also not an "Air Force" Aerostat as they like to profess, they are simply one of the organizations that utilized it but they've never built or "owned" an Aerostat. I have a very good picture for you if you'd be interested in swapping it?Mcgyver2k (talk) 04:39, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Swapping for your picture would great! dbabbitt (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of the THOR III antenna install[edit]

Not sure that the photo used is the best representation as it shows the Marine installing the antenna backwards. If you notice the bottom elements of the antenna they are only on one side of the assembly. This side is supposed to face forward and this is not going to happen unless the person is walking backwards or wearing the THOR on his chest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcgyver2k (talk • contribs) 11:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mcgyver2k, I noticed that but didn't want to create another public domain photo on Wikimedia.org about the same thing. Can you put some more aerostat photos in the public domain? I would like to see some photo NOT from the US up there. --dbabbitt (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I put up another public domain photo after all. dbabbitt (talk) 16:40, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Size[edit]

The article, which didn't exist not too long ago, now is within splitting range. A page of about 30 kB to 50 kB of readable prose, which roughly corresponds to 6,000 to 10,000 words, takes between 30 and 40 minutes to read at average speed, which is right on the limit of the average concentration span of 40 to 50 minutes.^[1] At 50 kB and above it may benefit the reader for us to consider moving some sections to other articles and replace them with summaries per Wikipedia:Summary style - see WP:SIZERULE for "a rule of thumb". Comprehension of standard texts at average reading speed is around 65%. We can take our time, but we need to determine whether the topic should be treated as several shorter articles and, if so, how best to organize them.

I fully concur but with caveat. If we split it but also change the paragraphs on some topics to summaries it will improve the page and keep it more in line with a quick reference.voiceofreason 06:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcgyver2k (talk • contribs)

References

^ John V. Chelsom, Andrew C. Payne, Lawrence R. P. Reavill (8 Apr 2005). Management for Engineers, Scientists and Technologists. John Wiley & Sons. p. 231. ISBN 9780470021279. Retrieved 20 February 2013.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Changing other peoples format[edit]

I notice that someone decided to 'help' me by changing the placement of photos with my text. What this did was cause the photo to be below instead of next to the description. I think it makes more sense and appears cleaner/more professional to have the photo right next to the text but maybe that's just a personal preference. Anyway, if you don't like the format, let me know and we'll put it to vote. I put it back the way it was. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcgyver2k (talk • contribs) 06:24, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Photos not corresponding to captions[edit]

The photos are merely random MWD photos and are not specific examples of what the captions portray. --dbabbitt (talk) 11:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Way Too Many Capital Letters[edit]

I get that militaries like to talk like this, so some capitalized terms are probably fine, but many aren't. Too many for me to fix. You do it! InedibleHulk (talk) 00:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Counter-IED efforts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1] John V. Chelsom, Andrew C. Payne, Lawrence R. P. Reavill (8 Apr 2005). Management for Engineers, Scientists and Technologists. John Wiley & Sons. p. 231. ISBN 9780470021279. Retrieved 20 February 2013.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

[1]