Talk:Counterplan

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Debating, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DebatingWikipedia:WikiProject DebatingTemplate:WikiProject DebatingDebating articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Requested move 21 October 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved back to long-standing title (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk) 02:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-Plan → Counterplan – Per the reliable secondary sources listed in this article itself, the spelling is "counterplan". Elizium23 (talk) 00:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support either counterplan or counter-plan. There is no need to capitalize the second half of the word. ONR (talk) 20:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No WP:RS provided in this article supports "counter-plan". Elizium23 (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just Googled "counter-plan" and everything that came up was spelled "counterplan". Can you cite a sampling of WP:RS which would support your suggestion of "counter-plan"? Elizium23 (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no source, then counterplan it is. ONR (talk) 01:44, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Counterplan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20020629065233/http://hsdebate.com/archives/theory/01-02/Problem_of_PCCs.html to http://hsdebate.com/archives/theory/01-02/Problem_of_PCCs.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]