Talk:Crash Boom Bang!

Crash Boom Bang! has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 14, 2008	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed
May 22, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has had a peer review which is now archived.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Wally Scharold (3 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (1 participant)
Omocat (4 participants)
Fortnite Chapter 5 Season 2: Myths and Mortals (9 participants)
SpongeBob SquarePants (disambiguation) (9 participants)
Stick Soldiers (2 participants)
Rick Jay Glen (4 participants; relisted)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (16 participants; relisted)
Atlus USA (15 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Villian or hero[edit]

Is the new character in Crash Boom Bang good or evil... [[User:SuperSaiyanCrash 20:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That hasn't been revealed yet, but judging from the plot synopsis, he (Viscount Devil) probably doesn't mean any harm to the characters. He is but the sponsor of a race for an ancient lost city and the Super Big Power Stone, and simply wants to use the contestants to discover both of their secrets. So it seems that Cortex is the main antagonist once again, seeing that he kinda stole Viscount's ancient map and all.

Cat's Tuxedo 21:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Final installment[edit]

I heard a rumor that this could be the final installment in the Crash bandicoot series I wonder if this is true —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sonicrules2 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

It is not true. Crash Online" is set to be released sometime later this year. Cat's Tuxedo 18:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crash of the Titans, perhaps? Michael Mad 13:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crash Online was vaporware. It may've even been a cover story for titans.88.109.179.70 16:06, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No article?[edit]

Why isn't there an article for Crash Online? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.244.187.122 (talk) 21:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Because not enough information about it has been released to be made into an article. We need stuff like the game cover, release dates around in USA, Europe, and Japan, who's making it... y'know, stuff like that. Cat's Tuxedo 21:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination[edit]

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of May 22, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?:

This article has some great prose. Good job on this!

2. Factually accurate?:

I don't see anything wrong. All sources seem reliable according to WP:V, but there are still some uncited sentences that need to be fixed if the FAC is a target

3. Broad in coverage?:

4. Neutral point of view?:

There isn't anything controversial about this material anyways

5. Article stability?

Very stable - no edits in a few days

6. Images?:

All images pass

Great job on this article! Pass without having to go on hold...not many articles can achieve that. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — haha169 (talk) 05:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

not real[edit]

This title doesn't exist because I never saw a commercial —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.90.206.193 (talk) 16:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. Just because some random person didn't see an ad, it doesn't exist. --88.109.24.237 (talk) 15:50, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confused[edit]

Story section "With the help of an explosive volcano, the contestants are able to board the Viscount's plane."

How exactly does the volcano help in the game? --YOWUZA Talk 2 me! 17:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crash Boom Bang!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061017041528/http://boombang.crashbandicoot.com/us/ to http://boombang.crashbandicoot.com/us/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]