Talk:Crawford Ker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit]

User:Johnelwayrules tagged this article as being written like an advertisement. If you agree with that assessment, please identify specific passages, because I don't see it. Mgreason (talk) 00:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some quotes which sound like promotion:
Under "Gainsville" "It closed and he learned a valuable lesson about absentee ownership."
This sound possible POV, i.e., someone's opinion about the experience rather than an objective assessment
Under "Lawsuit" " Hooters was also concerned about more WingHouse expansion and that WingHouse was doing better than Hooters."
This also sounds POV - Some verifiable source (food or restaurant critic/public survey/difference in profits, etc.) is needed to establish the claim "better"
Under "Franchising": WingHouses differ from other wing restaurants in several areas. Ker's emphasizes fresh product over frozen; they feature a full liquor bar; sports memorabilia lines the walls instead of NASCAR; "most locations include a game room. The company has extensive and well-established policies and procedures to ensure that costs are controlled and the customer experience is consistent regardless of the restaurant's location."
This sounds like it could be an advertisement for franchising -- It's more a matter of tone than content
Overall, I think it's a great article, and have no issues with the description of Mr. Ker's football career. While WingHouse is clearly an important part of Mr. Ker's biography, the writing sounds a bit too much like an advertisement than an objective description, as I have indicated above. Thanks, Johnelwayrules (talk) 01:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the tag after the recent edits -- the stuff that raised red flags for me is gone or cited.Johnelwayrules (talk) 14:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ker's WingHouse - Separate article[edit]

I wonder if this should be spun off into a separate article? Ker's WingHouse is noteworthy on its own, and would really need a separate article if anyone wanted to deal with the business in more detail than offered here (otherwise, it would have undue weight, I imagine, in a biography). Johnelwayrules (talk) 14:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Class rating[edit]

Updated class ratings for 3 categories and left comment. Mgreason (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Crawford Ker/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article contains basic info on Crawford Ker as a College and Professional football player. No attempt was made to research year-by-year performance or personal details. Mgreason (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:18, 6 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crawford Ker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:43, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crawford Ker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Crawford_Ker&oldid=1207952579"