Talk:Cricket at the 1900 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sarastro1 (talk) 08:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article, very interesting and well written. I'm aware that you are probably busy so I've tweaked any minor issues I saw rather than listing them here. Feel free to revert anything that doesn't work.

"Neither team was nationally selected": I quite like this phrase (lead and main body), but is there any way to tweak it to include that they were not representative as well? If not, no problem.
"The British side was a touring club team": A little clumsy; why not simply "touring club" or "touring team".
Not a big deal, but "retrospectively formally recognised " is a little cumbersome, but I realise all the words are sort of necessary. I tweaked the main body but not sure about lead.
Very minor, but cricinfo links are showing as redirects since it changed to "espncricinfo.com".
Any images available for any of this, it would really help if at all possible.
All refs check out.

I'll not even bother putting this on hold. If you are too busy to do much, I'll put it on hold in a couple of days, but there's very little to do. Hopefully a future FAC? I imagine it might go down quite well. It's almost a shame the article isn't "Cricket at the Olympics"! --Sarastro1 (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review: I've tweaked the language where you've mentioned it (I took retrospectively out completely, it seemed redundant). Also fixed the cricinfo links. Harrias ^talk 16:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All good, passing now. --Sarastro1 (talk) 23:40, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a photo of the venue. extra999 (talk) 03:46, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]