Talk:Cross-regional relations between North and Sub-Saharan Africa

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Angelina's Peer Review[edit]

Hi! I like how you chose to focus your article on Egypt and the policies of President Hosni Mubarak because I think this will help you maintain a clear focus throughout your article. You also have a wealth of great information and I think you have a ton of interesting material to cover. I think that for the best organization I would recommend breaking it up into sections later (this was just supposed to be a paragraph though so this looks great).

I would work on perhaps being a bit more specific in what are you are referencing (ex: "changed a lot" or "the revolutions") to be sure your reader understands what you are talking about. I would also work to avoid language that could seem biased like "more interesting", etc. Finally, maybe switch up your phrasing a bit to avoid using apparently as much, and consider using language like "according to xyz source" as it will be less repetitive and help you clearly indicate where information is coming from.

I can't wait to read your article when it's done!

Angelinaespinoza (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Katie's Peer Review[edit]

Great work thus far! Your article is clearly divided into several sections that are all relevant to your topic on the relations between North and South Africa. I like how your lead section or "background" nicely sets up what your article will cover and why it is significant to learn about the relationship in greater depth. Moreover, the article is well-drafted in a language that is informative and neutral, and all citations are working and up-to-date.

However, I would recommend that you add some images in the future to visually engage with readers and also to perhaps divide the "draft article" section into subsections to add clarity to your article. Considering the number of sections that you will work on and add to in the future, I am excited to see how this article develops!

Leekatie212 (talk) 01:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]