Talk:Cruising for sex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


We should add "Pimping" for this article[edit]

We should add "Pimping" for this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punkymonkey987 (talkcontribs) 23:45, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need heterosexual content[edit]

This article starts out defining "cruising" as the act of any person actively seeking sex, yet the rest of the article is all about gay men. 66.231.171.5 (talk) 00:17, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a gay slang term. Maybe that should be made more clear. -- Banjeboi 23:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd suspect it would be used by hetros too, but only a vastly smaller scale. Mathmo Talk

External links[edit]

I have removed http://www.bosie.tv/de/map/view/85 'world largest gay cruising guide' from external links as this is a general site for gay interest rather than specifically about cruising. A site like squirt.org would be more relevant but would fail the intent of DIRECTORY.—Ash (talk) 17:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A site like squirt.org would be more relevant ????? my god whats that ? remove whatever you want, if you have nothing better to do ! we are a non profit website with a cruising information for all gays in the world based on google maps. so where is your problem ? squirt is a contact magazine online. if you think this is it ? bravo ! rgds to all gays in the world

lord bosie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lord bosie (talkcontribs) 07:48, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

some articles on cruising[edit]

are reprinted here. -- Banjeboi 22:54, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The blog links to some legally questionable content. Two of the cruising videos showed drivers and their cars in a specific place claiming they were cruising for sex and some youtube videos had text overlays confusing "gay" with "perv" and "homo". I have flagged two of these for attention on youtube but the link here is not appropriate.—Ash (talk) 10:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lol! I didn't even watch the videos but for kicks i might now - can't anyone pretty much post anything on YouTube? -- Banjeboi 13:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
After the press attention over happy slapping, I think they introduced a better complaints system. This gives anyone the ability to flag a video if they feel in infringes their personal privacy or if it counts as defamation (this explicitly includes sexual orientation). So, for example, if you don't like a rapper video with lyrics such as "kill the batty-boi", you can flag it for removal. As for home-made sex videos, there seems to be no problem plastering anything you want over the internet... though xtube is probably better known for that...—Ash (talk) 14:35, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'm glad the flagging is at least available.
LOL! We must simply come up with better technology to deliver porn to every adult on the planet!!! -- Banjeboi 14:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cruising for sex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]