Talk:Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060506200437/http://www.czs.com.br/site/principal.htm to http://www.czs.com.br/site/principal.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Climate data[edit]
Wow. 2°C in the Amazon? That bears repeating. Is our source reliable? Weatherbase is not, as the data even contradicts itself, but even Weatherbase shows us that something very interesting is going on there. The French site is very difficult to navigate, and that is the only reason I'm suspicious of it .... but perhaps I shouldn't be. —Soap— 21:30, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
The Portuguese page, [1], shows record lows that are not quite as outstanding as ours, but are still far out of range of what most other deep-rainforest locations will ever see. It's quite possible that it's real and that the other source just doesnt have as much data. —Soap— 05:24, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
I have confirmed that the shockingly low values are found in the data compiled by the government of Brazil, which means it's verifiably real. —Soap— 00:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)