Talk:Curtiss P-60

Curtiss XP-60 production

Actually, while the Curtiss XP-60 showed advantages over the P-40 Warhawk to justify a production order for 1,950 P-60As, after the US entered World War 2 following the attack on Pearl Harbor, Curtiss had second thoughts about disrupting P-40 production for production of a new type at the crucial point. Thus, because Curtiss itself was too occupied with P-40 production at Buffalo, New York, the P-60 production order was canceled, but three on the contract were relegated to be experimental aircraft. 72.194.116.63 18:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Vahe Demirjian 10.00 25 February 2007

Note on disappointing P-60 top speed with laminar wing

When the P51 was first introduced it was nearly 100 mph faster than the P40, with the same engine (the single-stage supercharged Allison V12). The extraordinary increase was explained at the time as mostly due to the laminar-flow wing. The North American engineers in the late 1930s had stumbled over a European report that indicated an embedded aft radiator installation would provide negligible drag - or possibly a slight thrust increase, due to the carefully-ducted heated/expanding cooling air exiting at a higher speed than it came in. But this possibility was strictly an in-house item; it was not publicly discussed until nearly the war's end (another reason for the higher P51 speed was its narrow fuselage - the P40 fuselage was essentially unchanged from the P36 Hawk, which used a radial engine). Thus the high expectation on the part of the Curtiss engineers, of getting a spectacular top speed on the XP-53 when a laminar-flow wing was adopted, and thus the disappointment when the relatively wide fuselage with a chin radiator didn't deliver the expected speed even with the new wing. FWIW Raymondwinn (talk) 03:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

European report that indicated an embedded aft radiator installation would provide negligible drag - it wasn't European, it was from the RAE at Farnborough - see Meredith Effect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.57.230 (talk) 22:28, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curtiss P-60. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120610194710/http://www.aero-web.org/specs/curtiss/xp-60e.htm to http://www.aero-web.org/specs/curtiss/xp-60e.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)