This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Lewis, Rebecca; Marwick, Alice E.; Partin, William Clyde (May 2021). ""We Dissect Stupidity and Respond to It": Response Videos and Networked Harassment on YouTube". American Behavioral Scientist. 65 (5): 735–756. doi:10.1177/0002764221989781.
Marwick, Alice E. (April 2021). "Morally Motivated Networked Harassment as Normative Reinforcement". Social Media + Society. 7 (2): 1–13. doi:10.1177/20563051211021378.
Marwick, Alice E.; Caplan, Robyn (4 July 2018). "Drinking male tears: language, the manosphere, and networked harassment". Feminist Media Studies. 18 (4): 543–559. doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568.
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
Reyman, Jessica; Sparby, Erika, eds. (2020). Digital Ethics: Rhetoric and Responsibility in Online Aggression. Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Communication (1st ed.). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429266140. ISBN978-0-367-21795-2. S2CID189982687.
Over the next week or so I'll try to add a section on networked harassment with the sources I've just put above (and do a section redirect from Networked harassment to the appropriate section here, but I am aware of my COI with regard to a specific implementation of networked harassment and thus opening for discussion here prior to implementing those edits. lizthegrey (talk) 17:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like there are much better examples that could be used than Ruben Sim. No, he doesn't have a clean slate. But Roblox doesn't either and it has been clearly shown they do not care for child protection, and Sim's "trolling" isn't really enough to class it under cyberbullying. 114.76.242.255 (talk) 09:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2024[edit]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
add a new paragraph in Methods used:
In Dating apps
Dating app users who are victims of cyberbullying encounter a range of harmful behaviors, including catfishing, the uninvited sharing of personal images, and offensive remarks.[1] These activities not only violate personal boundaries but also have a detrimental impact on the victims' mental health.
Research by the Pew Research Center highlights how common this issue is, finding that almost 60% of female users between the ages of 18 and 34 have received unsolicited sexual messages or photographs on dating apps.[2] Moreover, it was found that 36% of American users of dating apps have been the victim of online abuse. Dating app users are more likely to experience hate speech and cyberbullying because of this rate, which is almost twice as high as the whole American population.[3] In addition to sexual harassment, other forms of cyberbullying and hate speech are among the most frequent forms of harassment that users of these sites report experiencing.
The fundamental safety and trust that underlie online dating sites' functionality are compromised by these upsetting encounters. Victims may experience significant effects, including elevated stress and anxiety levels and, in certain cases, chronic psychological trauma.[4][5] These results demonstrate how important it is that dating apps put strong security measures in place to protect their users. Stricter user authentication procedures, enhanced channels for reporting abusive activity, and the distribution of educational materials with the goal of encouraging a more polite and secure online dating community should all be part of these protocols. Eirik deklerson (talk) 09:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These results demonstrate how important it is that dating apps put strong security measures in place to protect their users. Stricter user authentication procedures, enhanced channels for reporting abusive activity, and the distribution of educational materials with the goal of encouraging a more polite and secure online dating community should all be part of these protocols. should not be added; that is editorialising/soapboxing and making recommendations rather than sticking to what the sourcing says. lizthegrey (talk) 10:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. RudolfRed (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. RudolfRed (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)