Talk:Cyclosa argenteoalba/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MeegsC (talk · contribs) 10:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look at this one. It may take me a few days to post my first comments. MeegsC (talk) 10:37, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As this appears to be a class project, I'll post a few initial comments to see if the nominating editor is still participating:

All measurements should be in imperial as well as metric units. The {{convert}} template is a great one to use here. Ping me if you're not sure how to use it.
Section headings should only have the first word capitalized: for example "Predation and coloring" rather than "Predation and Coloring".
Fully spell out the genus name anywhere that it starts a sentence: e.g. "Cyclosa argenteoalba are characterized..." rather than "C. argenteoalba are characterized..."
Drosophila should be italicized and capitalized, since it's a genus name.

Once I get a response indicating that the editor is watching this, I'll continue my review. MeegsC (talk) 12:34, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that there has been no response from the nominator in more than a week (and that the nominator has not edited since their class ended in December), I am assuming they are no longer interested in progressing this GA nomination. Therefore, I'm closing this review. The article is close to GA status, but will need some work—mostly MOS issues, copyediting, and reduction/explanation of jargon—in order to pass. I'm happy to review again in the future if someone decides to follow up. MeegsC (talk) 13:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]