Talk:DOGMA
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the DOGMA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Untitled[edit]
Dogma?
It's real work, although the article is turgid[edit]
I can't tell if this work is any good, but there are references to it. The article is far more turgid than the papers written by DOGMA's proponents. The Wikipedia article definitely needs a rewrite. Some references for background:
- Pieter De Leenheer
- "DOGMA-MESS: A Meaning Evolution Support System for Interorganizational Ontology Engineering"
It's a "semantic web" thing, yet another one of those ontology systems intended to impose some formal structure onto natural language. Historically, that doesn't work very well (see "Artificial Intelligence meets Natural Stupidity", by Drew McDermott), but people keep trying. --John Nagle 18:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
"we"?[edit]
"Therefore, in De Leenheer (2007)[8] he identified a set of primitive operators for changing ontologies. We make sure these change primitives are conditional, which means that their applicability depends on pre- and post-conditions[9]." - "We"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JensMueller (talk • contribs) 19:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)