Talk:Dacians/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 05:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Hi,I will be doing the review for this article.Firstly I will recommend you to provide citiations for the places where there is the citiation needed tag.Thanks.RRD13 (talk) 05:05, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I will be reviewing those tags shortly.--Codrin.B (talk) 09:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I tackled all the "citation needed" tags, adding sources where I found them or removed unsourced statements.--Codrin.B (talk) 09:50, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Origins and ethnogenesis

In the absence of written historical records-Why?Did writing was not known to them?

Indo-Europeanization was complete by the beginning of the Bronze Age-You can explain it in brief(not more than 2 sentences).

There are just single sentence lines which can be expanded

I have put a ^{[citation needed]}

RRD13 (talk) 17:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Currency section needs referencing.

The small paragraphs at the end of Material Culture makes it horrible

RRD13 (talk) 10:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've combined several small paragraphs, and two very small sub-sections, in the Dacians#Material culture section. See if this looks better. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I've gotten rid of any one-sentence paragraphs during my recent copyedit. — Mr. V (t – c) 05:36, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We need to deal with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view this aspect before we go any further. If the editors can deal with the section that has been tagged with Wikipedia:Neutral point of view then I will certainly endorse with for a GA. Nickelroy (talk) 18:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]